EnglishFrenchGermanSpainItalianDutchRussianPortugueseJapaneseKoreanArabicChinese Simplified
If you like the site do not forget to Subscribe to our mailing list

Enter your E-mail address:

Thursday, September 30, 2010

New ways to fight bacteria

 

As bateria develop resistance to antibiotics, researchers look for weapons in viruses, pharmabiotics, frog skins, cockroach brains, the human immune system and disarming compounds.

But inside the body, pharmabiotics can, like phage, evolve in step with disease-causing bacteria, so it should be hard for the bad bacteria to dodge the treatment.

Filutowicz, too, is toying with good bacteria that can seek out the nasty ones and either pump them full of antibiotics or force them to produce the antibiotics themselves. He founded a company, ConjuGon Inc., to develop his ideas. In a 2007 paper in the Journal of Burn Care & Research, Filutowicz reported that his pharmabiotics successfully knocked down infection and promoted survival in mice with infected burns.

Many current antibiotics come from bacteria or fungi that need to fight off neighboring microbes. Now, scientists are casting a wider net in their search for new antimicrobial agents — including looking in animals, such as frogs, that are very good at fighting off bacteria.

Michael Conlon, a chemist at the United Arab Emirates University in Al-Ain, invites colleagues to send him samples of the chemicals frogs secrete on their skin so he can test their antibacterial activity.

"People think I'm some kind of lunatic," Conlon says. "Why on earth would you ever look in frog skin for antibiotics?"

The reason is that frogs live in warm, wet environments, making their skin an appealing home for bacteria. So frogs have evolved an arsenal of bacteria-killing chemicals to protect themselves.

At the August meeting of the American Chemical Society in Boston, Conlon reported that he has amassed a collection of skin secretions from more than 6,000 kinds of frogs. He has found more than 100 frog slime compounds that attack bacteria. "They just rip big holes in the cell membrane," Conlon says.

Fighting off the frog bactericides will require larger evolutionary changes than bacteria needed to resist current antibiotics, so it should take a while before they manage to resist the new drugs.

Conlon is not the only scientist thinking beyond the ordinary in his hunt for new antibiotics. Frog skin sounds positively reasonable compared to what scientists at the University of Nottingham in the U.K. are exploring. At the September meeting of the Society for General Microbiology in Nottingham, Simon Lee presented work on antimicrobials he and colleagues found in the brains of cockroaches and locusts.

The bugs, after all, live in pretty dirty environments and need to prevent infection. The researchers found that the insect tissues killed more than 90% of the bacterium methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, better known as MRSA.

The immune system

While some scientists look outward, other scientists are looking inward at how the human body naturally fights infection. At the September Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy in Boston, scientists discussed a new kind of antibiotic based on human defensive weaponry that destroys the bacteria's membrane.

Because the membrane is such a complex part of the cell, it is unlikely that bacteria will quickly evolve ways to disable or avoid the drugs, says Richard Scott, vice president for research at PolyMedix Inc. in Radnor, Pa.

PolyMedix is designing chemicals that mimic the shape and action of bacteria-fighting proteins called defensins. They hope to target MRSA, for which only a couple of antibiotics are now effective.

PolyMedix researchers have already shown that their pseudo-defensin treats infections in animals. The drug appeared safe in a trial involving 77 healthy people; the main side effect was a tingling in the fingers and toes. The company hopes to soon test the drug in people with MRSA infections, Scott says.

Disarming

Menachem Shoham, a biochemist at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, isn't interested in killing bacteria such as MRSA. He hopes to simply disarm them.

Staph bacteria are quite common. In fact, Shoham says, one-third of us live comfortably with harmless staph in our bodies. But occasionally, those harmless bacteria start to produce toxins that destroy blood cells and cause disease.

Shohan is focusing on a bacterial gene, called AgrA, that bacteria need to make toxins. He has found a handful of compounds that block AgrA and protect blood cells, he reported at the ICAAC meeting.

Shoham's idea is to use these drugs not to stop the infection but to decrease its severity. Then, he expects, the patient's immune system can take over and cure the disease.

The drugs wouldn't kill the bacteria, so there's little incentive to develop resistance, Shohan says.

Ongoing battle

But ultimately, bacteria will come up with a way to beat even the most clever of human drug designers.

"As long as we are on this planet," Filutowicz says, "we will need new ideas and new antibiotics to confront bacteria."

1 comments:

welcome my friend in my blog
but now idon't know realy about zoflora
but be sure
i will ask my friends for this one , answer you shortly
thanks
tamer

Post a Comment